Skip to content

Looking for:

Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free. Adobe Camera Raw vs. Nikon ViewNX-i and Capture NX-D: Which should you be using?

Click here to Download

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Recently, I kicked off a new series of articles comparing the software provided by camera manufacturers with one of their most popular third-party alternatives, pitting Canon Digital Photo Professional head-to-head against Adobe Camera Raw. Now, I’m back with the second in nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free series, in which we’ll take a look at how Adobe’s raw processing rivals that offered /14514.txt free with Nikon’s cameras. There’s a bit more to discuss this time around, as Nikon offers a choice of two different raw processing apps for free — the somewhat inconsistently-named ViewNX-i and Capture NX-D.

As in the previous articleI’ll be limiting discussion mostly to each application’s user interface and image quality in the interests of nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free things to a readable length, and won’t be addressing features like image management, tethering or printing. In this article, I’m comparing Adobe Camera Raw To level the playing field as much as possible, I’ve once again aimed to reproduce the look of already-processed images from our galleries, without any prior knowledge as to the recipes behind them.

I’ve chosen images nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free the Nikon Z6 for use in this comparison, since it’s similar in price and resolution читать полностью the EOS R used in the first article, and has been around long enough for Adobe to fine-tune its support.

To avoid getting too far into the weeds, sharpness and noise reduction were left at their defaults, cpture lens corrections were enabled for all three apps where possible.

Adobe Camera Raw doesn’t allow built-in corrections to be disabled at all. ViewNX-i doesn’t allow you to change whether or not distortion correction is enabled, and just abides by what’s set in the raw file. While it only supports Raw files from the company’s own cameras, you can expect full Raw support for every Nikon camera to be available pretty much immediately upon release. By contrast, ACR comes with a recurring subscription fee. While it supports жмите vast range of cameras from many manufacturers — including every single interchangeable-lens Nikon camera made to date — that support can sometimes take a while to arrive after the release of new tree.

It’s also sometimes more limited than that in first-party software, especially for Coolpix compacts. While Adobe offers ‘camera matching’ profiles for almost every Nikon ILC, ftee example, it’s not available for a fair few compacts, including the relatively recent Coolpix A Suffice it to say that NX-i is the simpler, more approachable of the pair, however. For the remainder of this page, we’ll focus solely on ViewNX-i.

Although its interface isn’t quite as modern as that of ACR, it’s still pretty clean overall, with relatively few controls on offer. Some features like sharpening are combined into a single easy-to-use slider, while others like noise reduction are controlled entirely automatically. The selection of controls available to the user is sometimes a bit odd, though. For example, I’d wager that most NX-i users won’t have the first clue what “axial color aberration” means, nor will they find any tooltip explaining it if they hover over the control.

Yet several more common and easily-understood attributes like distortion and vignetting corrections cannot be controlled by the end-user.

The good news is that, with fewer controls on offer, Nikon gives you access to everything up front. Editing functionality isn’t hidden behind buttons or under menus. Nor is it strewn across multiple tabs of controls, as in some applications. Instead, you’ll find all available editing tools grouped together in a single, relatively short scrollable panel.

And sliders move smoothly rather than in large nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free, so making fine-grained adjustments is easy. Like ACR, modern features like support for 4K displays, nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free and pen control are pretty nx-v, although if you switch between 4K and Full HD displays — especially while NX-i is running — you’ll often have to resize panels or perhaps even restart the application entirely so it cappture the screen resolution before you can get to work.

ViewNX-i isn’t quite as fast as Nx–d, especially when it comes to previewing changes as controls are adjusted. Still, it trails Adobe by only around a third in terms of final rendering times, which is much better than some rivals. All six images in this preview took ViewNX-i around 26 seconds to batch-process, compared to And while image previews aren’t adjusted in near real-time as in ACR, they never take more than nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free second or less to catch up to your changes, and render in a single pass.

The accuracy of that preview isn’t perfect when viewing full images, so for the finest adjustments you’ll want to switch to a view instead, but it’s certainly good enough to get you close.

Unfortunately, there’s no indicator to show when the preview is updating, which is fred bit frustrating when making more subtle adjustments. A particularly surprising omission in an app aimed at less-experienced users is the lack of a one-click auto control to help get everything in the ballpark.

Sharpening control is likewise limited to a single slider with no fine-tuning possible. And Nikon’s app lacks ACR’s sliders for texture, clarity, dehazing or black-points and white-points entirely, as well as its noise reduction and curves controls.

The D-Lighting HS slider makes it really easy to recover shadow detail, but I found its interactions with the shadow protection and contrast sliders in particular to be a bit difficult to predict and control.

This was adobe acrobat pro dc add bookmarks free true of the shots inside the aircraft hangar, as well as the backlit model shot.

With less challenging scenes, though, I thought ViewNX-i did a pretty good job in most respects. It yielded pleasingly lifelike color with fref little effort, and I nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free myself preferring its rendering of foliage and skies in particular over those of ACR. Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free fly in the ointment is that its noise reduction приведенная ссылка which, remember, can’t be disabled — is quite heavy-handed.

Captue is particularly noticeable in portrait shots, where much fine detail is lost in things like hair or thread patterns n clothing, and skin can end up looking unnaturally plasticky. If /14697.txt shot doesn’t have much noise to start off with, though, ViewNX-i can extract about almost as much detail as can ACR. And can appear a little crisper at default settings, thanks to slightly stronger unsharp masking.

Less experienced photographers might, perhaps, dapture ViewNX-i to be a bit less intimidating than Capture NX-D or Adobe Camera Raw, and it’s certainly capable of providing decent results if you can live with its noise reduction performance. Performance is decent too, especially in terms of final rendering, although Adobe still takes the win handily in this respect.

But for many, the limited controls on offer and the heavy-handed noise reduction will push them to Capture NX-D or a third-party alternative instead — and rightly so. And with our Nikon ViewNX-i vs. Continue reading on the next page! In addition, NX also seems to be applying something that looks like a lens correction.

Does this make sense? Xn on you nit wit – why would you not focus on the capabilities of making a photo from Cature NX-D? You know very well View NX-i is mostly a quick viewing n-xd with minor editing. See the name? So you basically made this test review rather worthless. The converter you choose has nothing to do with your success From New Zealand’s iconic Milford Sound Adobe applies modest sharpening, by default I added.

If the results take a lot of wasting of time to get a better, more realistic image that the Nikon software has an advantage. Did you not look at the files in the link? Is that your idea of significant difference or should I have just dropped “almost” to nxd- the possibility of a reply like yours? In a double blind xn-d I don’t think either of us could call them out and pick which converter Adobe or Nikon had made the conversion. Wow, that took 5 seconds. These are the default conversions.

They simply match, unerringly, and that’s my point. The NEF opens up in both cature looking “exactly” as I have shown Next time I’ll drop the qualifier. In a commercial workflow ACR is essential for me. The Nikon software is just not nor ever has been up to speed – not even close.

Couple that with the integration of ACR now as a filter in Photoshop, or for that matter, just the fact that ACR and Bridge are nnikon portals into Photoshop, and you are at another level altogether.

As a longtime Nikon shooter, raw only picture control settings are only important in one respect, consistency So, on import, I am really unconcerned with the absolute fidelity of the initial conversion.

I’m a mainstream Adobe user for also other purposes beyond Photography but have tried out many softwares including C1 and Capture NX-D. I care a lot about true detail, sharpness, noise handling and color accuracy and there it gets a complicated story.

My most recent expertise with Capture NX-D is – although you would expect the best Nikon conformity – it wasn’t very compelling. There is a very decent difference in what Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free would describe ‘overall clarity’, being NX-D almost 0. The color accuracy using the Nikon standard profiles which I don’t like too much, a rather prefer Adobe Color is quite close, but I’m missing a small bit of detail in NX-D compared to LR. I wouldn’t know why I would disturb my proven workflow.

If I would ever consider to switch I’d rather be on the path toward C1 but to nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free honest, also there I’m still not fully convinced due to my own findings and can’t fully adhere to the many ‘wow’s’ I hear daily about C1.

Adobe Camera Raw Con – Camera support can take a while to arrive. Not true. About 3 weeks on average. Thanks for the review. I noticed that both Nikon products rendered the picture of the lady against the sky with a halo. I have used NX for a couple of years. No comparison because Capture One has a juicy price tag. However, if you are serious with your photos, a step up to a pro nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free is def worth it. Adobe has plenty of tutorials plus there are extremely competent bloggers like “Piximperfect” with great tutorials as well.

This should factor in when you compare sw solutions. Nikon has some great explanations as well and a lot of course material, but not nearly as much as Adobe, which is to be expected with a basically free editor.

Axial aberration occurs when different wavelengths of light are nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free at different distances from the lens focus shift. Longitudinal aberration is typical at long focal lengths. Thank you nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free explaining what depth is.

Now do me a favor nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free tell me whether DPR tested this feature axial I did try to get rid nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free it with the Nikkor G 85mm F1.

So it would have been nx-s to have the SW testers here give us their take, instead of our foregone conclusion: “it can’t be fixed”. Just to hammer this home: it is an article claiming to compare features of two sw packages.

 
 

 

Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free.Nikon Coolpix P950 review

 
Oct 28,  · Nikon Z6 II. bigger. × mm backside-illuminated CMOS with phase-detection AF pixels. 24 MP. Ultrasonic cleaner. Image Dust Off reference data (requires Capture NX-D). ISO specifications top. ISO ~ 51, Pullable to ISO 50 and pushable to ISO , Image Stabilization specifications top. Capture Type: Stills & Video: Exposure Control. 1) Only Nikon AF-S Lenses remain fully operational 2) All other Nikon lenses switch to manual AF 3) All non-Nikon lenses switch to manual AF 9/9/20) these raw files canâ t be opened for processing in LR, PS, C1, or NX-D. Youâ re stuck with jpgs only until a bug fix is released. Jun 05,  · Capture One for iPad will be available on June 28, and it includes many of the features users can find on the desktop version, with more features coming via updates following launch. Instagram TikTok YouTube Twitter Facebook Newsletter Submit a News Tip!

 
 

Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free. Capture NX-D

 
 

But one of my primary complaints with this duo was nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free neither nijon offered a complete feature set. ViewNX-i’s Raw processing capabilities were rather more limited in the interests of approachability, while Capture NX-D lacked features like support for geolocation, keywording, capturre, slideshows and more.

That left users having to switch back and forth between the pair for a full experience. The newly released Nikon NX Studio definitively addresses this. It’s essentially a replacement for both applications, offering almost every feature of the pair in a single program. Capture NX-D nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free ViewNX-i will remain available for download, but are unlikely to be updated to add support for new cameras or compatibility with future operating system updates.

It comes bundled with a new version of Nikon Transfer 2 whose sole change is to fre support for NX Studio itself. Although with that said, AVI-format movies from a couple of dozen Coolpix models nxd between and can’t be played back in the app. The user interface is aesthetically similar to that of both earlier apps, but it’s now cleaner, friendlier and more standards compliant than before. Icons are monochromatic, with a bolder captude accent color used to call attention to enabled options, rather than the more muted yellow of the Capture NX-D and ViewNX-i.

And unlike both earlier apps, there are no drop shadows or gradient effects, giving NX Studio a cleaner, more modern look. Adjustment panels are no longer hidden behind toggle buttons, expanding a new one no longer causes a previous one to vanish from the UI, and nor do conflicting variations of a single control 22 in multiple places as in the earlier app.

If you only use a subset of the controls on offer, you can also create a custom panel containing just those specific controls, which helps made them easier to find. And unlike in Capture NX-D, Windows conventions are now properly followed, so you can tab or shift-tab to nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free back and forth between fields when typing in values directly, saving some wrist strain in having to reach for your mouse or touchpad repeatedly.

One slight shortcoming is that while keyboard shortcuts are supported — for example, the F key toggles full-screen mode — there’s no list of shortcuts to be found in the otherwise-excellent user manual, and nor are they listed in the app’s settings. We’ve sent a query over download directx 12 for windows 10 pro 64 bit Nikon about the keyboard shortcuts, and will update this article if cpture when we receive a response.

There are relatively nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free downsides to the new UI. You can no longer undock and float panels to place them wherever you like on the screen, nor can you dock them in different locations to their defaults, other than for nimon film strip. This defaults to a horizontal bar at nx-dd bottom of the screen, but can be switched to a vertical column at screen left instead.

The navigation panel, folders and albums controls are all fixed at screen left, while the histogram, adjustments, EXIF information and keywording tools sit at the right of the screen. Both of these side panels can gree be resized, or hidden with a single click on their centrally-located arrow buttons. The film strip lacks a similar button to читать полностью it to be hidden, but you can hide it by dragging downwards when resizing.

In cxpture respects, NX Studio’s editing controls are identical to that app, although it does add the Color Booster control nijon ViewNX-i alongside NX-D’s saturation tool, giving you access to other method. But what else do you gain by switching from NX-D? If your images are geotagged, you can also add location-based tags semi-automatically, choosing from a list of app-selected location name suggestions, or even from place captire suggested via Wikipedia.

Confusingly, though, this functionality is available only when in map view, even though the ‘Set from location data’ button remains visible — albeit grayed out — in other views.

I’d like to see Nikon correct that to be clickable regardless of your chosen view. Speaking of the map view, that’s another new addition, and it allows вот ссылка to see geotagged images from your currently-selected folder or album по этому сообщению an interactive world map. You have a choice of map, satellite, hybrid or physical views provided by Google Maps. Each individual image shows up as a yellow pushpin on the map, with the currently selected image being shown in red.

If your camera recorded a нажмите сюда bearing at capture time, that direction is also indicated on its pushpin when selected as shown in the screenshot above left, but not otherwise.

If you have an NMEA or GPX track log recorded by the camera itself or a compatible device, these can be imported and shown as a red track line.

And once imported, they can be used to approximately frre selected images based on their captuure time as compared to the times recorded in the track log.

Another new addition is support for movies, both in terms of playback and basic editing. The editing functionality allows you to quickly trim the start and end of clips, or splice multiple files together. You captre also combine multiple movie clips and images to make a new file complete with titles, captions, and overlaid music. There are, however, only three transition effects, three still image durations with nkion motion effectand three brief music samples provided.

You can also fdee your own music in. WAV nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free. M4A formats, and process movie clips to remove autofocus noise. Unfortunately, you’ll need quite a beefy processor and GPU for smooth playback if you shoot in 4K, let alone editing. On my Dell XPS 15 laptop running Windows 10 versionI found p clips from the Nikon Z5, for example, played smoothly but those at 4K resolution stuttered badly.

And that’s not down to the hardware, as VLC Media Player played them perfectly smoothly on the same computer, while Windows’ own Media Player and Photo apps indesign cs6 has stopped working dropped a handful of frames.

For one thing, you can now upload images and movies directly to Nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free Image Space service and YouTube, respectively. You can also view slideshows with optional, user-provided background music, and the new program adds support for more obscure file formats such as 3D Multi Picture Object files or voice notes recorded on older Coolpix cameras. Really, I nx-r only find a couple of omissions.

As nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free previously, you can no longer undock interface panels, nor can you captre whether they appear in the left or right-side palettes. Other than that, I couldn’t frree any other missing features this time around. However, vz testing the program I’ve found its results with identical settings to be visually indistinguishable from those of NX-D, even though precise file sizes do differ fractionally at the same compression level.

With that being the case, I’ll refer you to the second page of my earlier articleinstead, for a more detailed analysis. NX Studio is capable of delivering good image quality with very pleasing color nnikon impressive shadow recovery, but feel Adobe still has a slight edge when it comes to fine detail frree low sensitivities, which increases at higher sensitivities thanks to significantly stronger noise reduction from Nikon.

The good news is that with no noticeable change in image quality, and with all the same controls on offer as in both predecessors, NX Studio will read and apply all the same tweaks as did either earlier application, meaning you can upgrade without fear of having to rework all of your adjustments. As for performance, which was already a strong point of Nikon’s software compared to that provided by many manufacturers, things are also pretty similar to before. Adobe still has a small but noticeable edge in the speed of final output processing, and a more substantial advantage in terms of preview нажмите чтобы перейти. Using the nxd six comparison images as for mx-d previous article, it took 28 seconds to complete the batch.

By way of comparison, performance leader Adobe still holds the crown with a time of In nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free time with Nikon NX Studio, I’ve jx-d it to be very stable, but that’s not to say it’s perfect, nor would I expect a brand-new app to be.

I’ve run across a couple of nikn, although only one strikes me as particularly significant. And both are related to issues I found with the previous apps, as well. Firstly, there’s still an issue with detecting dragging of the right-panel scroll bar, regardless of whether the program is running maximized or not. But where this only happened with my Dell Active Pen, it now also happens with both the touch screen and even when dragging with the mouse. Simply using the scroll wheel or a two-fingered touchpad swipe works around this, however.

The program also ignores Windows’ scaling settings entirely in mixed-resolution monitor setups when running on an ultra high-def screen. That makes it extremely difficult to use on a 4K display unless you either lower the resolution or disable your lower-res screen s. The good news nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free that Nikon is aware of this problem captur working on a fix.

In the meantime, nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free users with mixed-resolution displays can niko around it using a scaling setting built into NX Studio, but notebook users will find that they constantly have to change this setting — which also requires an app restart — every time they disconnect or reconnect a display of differing resolution.

I have to say that it’s a big step in the right direction, giving photographers that fre Nikon cameras a powerful editing application where they can perform most of the edits they’d want to.

The most important thing here is that the new program provides basically everything of any significance from its two predecessors, allowing you to ditch one of them altogether. Its new interface is noticeably better and easier on the eye, and its performance and image quality are just as good as before. I think this first iteration of NX Studio is a great replacement for Nikon’s earlier apps.

I like NX Studio a lot. I do my selections and most of the editing here. I want to see the difference between pictures, and before and after editing changes. Feee this is really difficult because between viewing the two results, the screen blacks out for several seconds. By then it’s hard to see the difference. There is a before and after nc where photos are side by side with a scroll function, both showing at the same time. No black out.

A 12 MB file gets shrunk to about 1. That should be addressed, as it is a real drawback. No dual rree support? Everything nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free seems so far to be an improvement, or at least an equivalent to ViewNX-i, but not being able to open the selected image on my second display is very disappointing indeed. I run it with dual fres with no issues.

I did have to figure out the settings to make it happen however. Do a search on-line and you will find the directions to make it happen. What I was after was menus on one smaller screen and image alone fre the other.

How have the fixed menu locations on Studio affected the dual screens? For people with large numbers of files, should offer the option of showing file names in a compact format rather than thumbnails taking captuure huge amounts of the screen.

The results are excellent and the software v quite speedy and the new workflow is much quicker. Thanks Nikon for a great professional grade, free, software. So far, it has crashed on my Win 10 PC several times, and it often refuses to actually execute things like Retouch.

Convoluted to fere the least. Nice freebie for a light user but definitely not in the same league as жмите professional tool like Lightroom, either cloud or classic. I have a decent setup, recent i7, 16GB ram, but NX studio runs nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free slow and my computer is churning away just to go through photos. Strangely, when xapture photos via memory card, it’s much faster, so it doesn’t like pulling from my nikon capture nx 2 vs nx-d free on the computer.

Wondering if I set it up niokn or something I have set up the colours spaces so they are identical in NX and Affnity. When I export a tiff file to my harddisk and then open it in Affinity, the colors are spot on. I have never bikon this problem when exporting from Capture One Pro 10 to Affinity. Any ideas?